Reaper is small enough that you can run it from a USB stick, whereas Abelton can occupy more than 70 GB of hard disc space.Reaper doesn’t have built-in instruments, whereas Ableton does come with some.Reaper features a powerful ReaScript scripting engine that allows you to code any improvement you want in Python, EEL, or Lua, whereas Ableton doesn’t have a scripting engine.The main differences between Reaper vs Ableton are: For real world recording, in my book, it wins by a mile.Main Differences Between Reaper vs Ableton If you are editing midi all day for a job, Reaper probably wouldn't be my first choice. Thing was, I wouldn't use them day to day and when I ran into a situation where I needed it, it took longer to read up on it and learn it than to just do it by hand. Like I said, Cubase does have some crazy functions for midi, really detailed. For me, straight recording of audio and midi and editing both, Reaper wins. If you are more a loop person, there are probably better programs than either, if you are doing high end midi, where you are editing midi files all day and need a high level of control, Cubase might be better. If you are into highly detailed midi editing, Cubase might be the better choice, though for audio, Reaper killed Cubase when I switched. As a functional day to day thing, Reapers midi is more than fine. When I first started using it, the midi was pretty weak, but they have worked on it over the years. I've done all sorts of midi input from a keyboard, drums, keys, whatever, and then edited in Reaper. I use the midi in Reaper all the time, I am using Superior drums, which is the same company as EZ. And honestly, for years it was ONLY a MIDI program, so that is exactly what I used it for. Like it has logic that you could micro edit certain parameters on certain notes, to a fine detail. Like I was saying, Cubase has some pretty out there midi functions, I don't remember, it has been 15 years. It really is mostly what you get used to. I've watched guys who know it use it, and it is bang and done. I find pro tools a pain in the butt, I have/had a copy and never used it, I couldn't figure out how to do anything or where it was. What is different is the workflow, and a big part of that is what you are used to. That being said, the thing is, they all pretty much do the same thing. I have had no reason in 15 years to look elsewhere. I had tried a few other daws over the years and it was pretty easy to take up Reaper. The routing and the whole track setup I took to immediately. I come from tape in the old days, and record audio mostly. If you I doing midi mostly, I might lean more Cubase. Most of the advanced functions in Cubase, I rarely used and would end up spending more time reading the manual that it would have taken just doing it by hand. Reapers used to be not great but they have added a lot over the years, and is plenty good for what I do. I started on Cubase 1.01, right after it was ported over to PC and was MIDI only.Ĭubase at that time still had better midi functions that Reaper has now, in my opinion. I switched to Reaper probably 15 years ago, after using Cubase for 10. At this point, I don't even have the heart to tell him he could have had it all for $60, while he constantly runs into roadblocks I don't have (but which could be "fixed" on PT by spending more money).īesides, I'm a cheapskate and even Elements costs 50% more than fully-functioning Reaper. He spent $$$ on PT, figuring that if he spent enough he'd have all the capability he'd ever need. "I wonder if anyone sells a phone app that would let me control transport from my phone?" One minute later I find out it's already built into the DAW.ĭon't fall into the trap a friend recently fell into when he decided to get back into home recording. Even after all these years, I still find myself wondering how to do some obscure thing, go online and find out that everything I need is built in. The downside is that it can be overwhelming at first, but there are plenty of YouTube videos to explain everything. The problem with scaled-down anything is that even if you get 95% of the capabilities, eventually that other 5% includes exactly what you want to do. I started with Cakewalk and stuck with it through its transition to Sonar (back when it was very expensive) before switching.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |